Previous Entry Share Next Entry
A few incomplete thoughts on Mockingjay, Part 1
local_max
Overall, I think I liked it. I have some criticisms but maybe another time. For now, just some thoughts on the movie (and the book), starting with: what is a mockingjay?

1. A mockingjay is the offspring of genetically engineered jabberjays with mockingbirds. The jabberjays were created by the Capitol to spy on people; mockingjays sing beautiful songs. The Capitol's attempts to exert control on every aspect of society, including by creating new tools at the DNA level, are subverted by the procreative urge in the birds. A mockingjay is the grass that grows between the cracks of the sidewalk; it is the result of the primal creative force of life bursting forth within, and even *because* of the most tightly controlled society ever designed.

2. A mockingjay is a being whose defining characteristic is its ability to beautifully, soulfully, reproduce exactly sounds made by others, which it is unable to understand itself.

I'm not sure what I think of the movie overall -- I think I liked it -- but I think that it gets (and gets across) the central tension at the heart of Katniss' role in the revolution that springs up around her: Katniss is, at this moment, the symbol of humanity whose passion can no longer be contained or destroyed, and a tool being used to beam a desire to go fight and die into millions of people's heads.

And that's sort of the trick: to bring down the extremely, shockingly oppressive aristocracy, you need numbers, raised fists in unison like an Eisenstein poster. (I could have done without the oorah, though.) And how much do you need of each person? When you need every body and to conserve everything, to go down to 14% oxygen for a night, suddenly "luxuries" like alcohol, wigs and cats become illegal. For a moment I was thinking how ridiculous it is that Prim becomes the ONLY person to nearly be locked out when District 13 shuts itself down, but of course she is: the survivors of District 12 are the only civilians in District 13 who would think of defying the order to move down into the bunker, which has been drilled into the people for years. They had to, to survive; District 13 is a fighting force, in a way District 12 wasn't. But the people that Katniss are fighting for are the remnants of 12, and they still have individual things they care about.

What degree of control, authoritarian control, and for what reasons, one has to put up with; is it better, in an underground bunker where everyone is fed and they have a chance to strike back at the Capitol but no one can have pets or drink or dress themselves or display individuality, or above ground where people were starving and taking on the Capitol was a pipe dream and an impossibility but people could make their own choices? It's, I suppose, moot now that District 12 is gone -- but one of the principal questions of Mockingjay (the book and film) is what District 13 has lost in order to be the sole region to survive completely separate from the Capitol's influence, and what this means should there be anyone left standing if the Districts and the Capitol go for all out war.

Plutarch changes "a necklace of rope" to "a necklace of hope" in the song, and the call to suicide becomes a call to freedom. And is taking on the Capitol a fight for freedom or a call to suicide? Is there even a difference? (Finnick said, at the beginning, that he wished that Annie was dead, that they were all dead, rather than being punished by the Capitol.) And the quiet beauty of Katniss singing an old, half-remembered song becomes the inspirational/horrifying sight of thousands of people singing a song about murder, lynching and romantic suicide as an anthem of revolution, the Mockingjay leading an army of mockingjays out to throw themselves onto the gears of the great machine and slow it down with their bodies and blood. In the propaganda wars that break out, Peeta and Katniss are opposed symbols, one used by the Capitol and one used by Coin. And both are as honest as they can be, in their situations; both are unwilling to break their own personal moral codes. Katniss looks at the horror that has befallen those she cares about, looks at the hospitals being burned to the ground, and the rage and fire within cannot be sated: Snow is a monster, the Capitol continues to oppress and destroy them, and they need to fight back. Peeta is biding his time for a moment where he has built up enough media capital to scream a warning to protect people's lives, but I also think that he genuinely means what he's saying, because, yes, going after the Capitol is suspiciously like suicide. It's also a call to complacency against a juggernaut that has massacred them and will do so again. Sure, the propaganda is manipulative, and sure no one seems to know what they are singing when they bravely march into battle singing Hanging Tree, but you need every tool you can to dismantle Snow's machine, right? Right?

As with the rest of the media stuff in this series, we're also looking at the bleeding of individual and group -- how Katniss' authentic, idiosyncratic, personal Katnissness is selectively edited, channeled, and packaged to make her the symbol of what everyone else should be, an individualism immediately transformed into a legion's (or fanbase's, or cult's) adulation, the ultimate It girl. And of course, you can't fake authenticity -- so rather than have Katniss try and fail to "act," Coin et al. simply put her in emotionally traumatic situations to produce the exact Pavlovian emotional response they want from her! Katniss is not a wholly passive figure, here -- she advocates for the Victors and for Prim, she regularly defies Coin on a personal level -- and she's not actually programmed the way Peeta is, with actual neurotoxins and torture. But Katniss is a traumatized young woman who has a team of handlers working together to figure out how to maneuver her into having the emotional reactions they want her to have. She isn't yet getting out of that. And I think about Peeta's admonition to her, while he was being used as a tool, which may ironically be the key: think for yourself.

The questions are what conditions are worth living with, and what is it that's worth dying for -- a cat, a sister or friend, a freedom, or power? I do wish this was given more dramatic kick than it was, but still, I do love that Snow has a slow-creeping poison devouring him, which was literally self-administered in order to amass power. In general, how much do you compromise, of personal freedom, to stay alive? How much are, as Snow points out, the things that one wants what will destroy you? If the contrast between Snow's poisoning himself for power and Prim nearly dying to rescue her damned cat or Katniss being broken again and again by Snow's use of Peeta tells anything, it may be this: yes, you may be destroyed as a result of what you love. But nothing lasts forever. In a world where everything you love may destroy you, choose to love someone or something worth dying for.

  • 1
Happy birthday, Max!

I love your thoughts. It hadn't even occurred to me that Snow was talking from experience when he said the things we love most destroy us: his love of power is literally slowly killing him (but, as all people who love power above all else, he is still holding onto it as strongly as possible and doing everything to keep it). One of the best movie additional scenes. Overall, I'm pleasantly surprised by 1) how faithful the film series is to the books (if anything, each new movie is a more faithful adaptation than the previous one) and 2) how organic the additional scenes and changes feel in the narrative.

It's funny that Mockingjay part 1 has so much lower Rotten Tomatoes score, I liked this one the most out of the three movies so far. Now, I really loved the first one when I first saw it, which was before I had read any of the books; it's what made me pick them up in the first place. It's a really good movie, but looking back, after having read the book, it did drop the ball in a few places. I love the additional scenes and dialogue, though, from Seneca to Cato. The second movie was objectively considerably better and did most things right, but as someone who had read the book, I was disappointed by a couple of choices. I'm also someone who loves Mockingjay the best out of the three books - but I also think that the movies have the chance to expand and improve on it in the way the first two did not, by moving more outside of Katniss' POV, and by fleshing out some moments and the new characters (something they have been doing pretty well so far, already giving more screentime to the likes of Cressida and Pollux). I was afraid I may display the syndrome of a book reader who never gets impressed by the adaptation, or has a bunch of issues with it even when it's overall OK (which, for instance, happens to me a lot with Game of Thrones), but I really enjoyed this one.

My only complaints are the lack of focus and development of Haymitch, and Gale's uncharacteristic mildness. I guess they're trying to save his anger, vindictiveness and indiscriminate anti-Capitol feelings more for part 2 when they become a plot point - but still, it's really OOC for Gale to be so nice to Effie. In the book, there are lot of hints early one, as in the (missing in the movie) scene where he and Katniss argue about the treatment of her prep team (who don't seem to be in Mockingjay, but Effie could have easily taken their role). It doesn't help that Gale is played by Liam Hemsworth, who's physically a good match but not the greatest actor. I thought he was OK in Catching Fire and did show some of Gale's anger, but there's almost none of that in this movie. He just comes off as a nice and sad dude most of the time.

I've also seen people voice complaints about the way Finnick's confession was done - that, even though the rescue sequence was great, it took away the focus too much from what Finnick was saying. I don't know if I agree with that - but I can't really guess how the scene worked for non-book viewers and if they paid attention to Finnick, since I was already expecting the confession to begin with.

Thanks!

Yeah, I think the movie was good. It's actually very hard to evaluate this series (as it is hard to evaluate the Harry Potter movies, though for different reasons) because I do find it hard to separate out the movies from the books. I have read the books once and I enjoyed them very much but I don't remember everything in them (e.g. the uniforms, and the District 2 things I had forgotten about).

Gale definitely is super calm. There isn't really much definition to him -- and without that Gale anger (which fits in with the naming -- Gale as in storm), it's hard for the Gale/Peeta comparison to pop. The shipping stuff still exists in the movie, but the point is that Peeta is ultimately someone who can adapt to peacetime and Gale isn't, with the related point that Katniss is capable of being a warrior but prefers to settle into peace, and without Gale's aggression it sort of becomes a round of which boy is cuter.

I did think Finnick's confession plays a little weird. I think the question is, have the movies set things up enough such that what Finnick has to say is going to have an impact on the moviegoing audience? And I can't really say.

  • 1
?

Log in

No account? Create an account